GMAT語法實例的講解分析
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.
A.a greater proportion than it was
B.a greater proportion than
C.a greater proportion than they have been
D.which is greater than was so
E.which is greater than it has been
這道題為什么B是對的啊?
句子分析：
Soaring television costs accounted for … half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than in any previous election.
Soaring television costs主語，accounted for謂語，a greater proportion為同位語，修飾前面整個名詞短語。
考點：
指代一致(Agreement)
1. which就近指代名詞，不能指代完整的一句話;
2. it在文中，會繼承被指代對象的特性，業(yè)即本文中，it 如果指代 a great proportion或者 the spending ，都繼承了a great proportion或者 the spending 發(fā)生在presidential campaign of 1992的.特性，造成比較的邏輯關(guān)系錯誤，要引以注意。
3. 比較對象的內(nèi)容，時態(tài)關(guān)系，邏輯含義均要對等。
選項分析：
(A) it指代的是a greater proportion整個短語，錯誤，應(yīng)該用that來指代proportion，但是因為只是名詞短語的比較，that可以省略而不帶任何歧義。
(B) Correct;原句補完整：Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992,
a greater proportion than(the proportion)(television costs had accounted for of the spending)in any previous election。
(C) 現(xiàn)在完成時使用錯誤，in any previous election說明應(yīng)用過去完成時;they指代soaring television costs，使邏輯意義錯誤，比較結(jié)構(gòu)需要比較對象對等，前者為a great proportion 是一個量詞不能和具體的費用對比，而且其他的election不一定是soaring的;同時have been與前面的accounted for不平行，只要也要用have done。
(D) Which不能指代前面整個idea;so用于省略重復(fù)的動作，使用錯誤。
(E) Which不能指代前面整個idea;it指代不清，且has been時態(tài)與后面的in any previous election不符。
以上就是對于GMAT語法實例分析的全部內(nèi)容，值得注意的是考生朋友在拿到GMAT語法題是需要先將原句進(jìn)行，并能找出GMAC想考察我們哪方面的考點，最后在將選項進(jìn)行對比，最后祝大家都能考出好成績。
【GMAT語法實例的講解分析】相關(guān)文章：
雅思寫作語法的實例講解10-26
JavaScript實例講解11-11
講解PAT配置「實例」08-09
GMAT邏輯論述講解09-15
PHP類的使用實例講解11-18
講解靜態(tài)NAT配置「實例」08-09
GMAT語法考點總結(jié)08-22