GMAT新黃金范文參考

　　All groups and organizations should function as teams in whicheveryone makes decisions and shares responsibilities and duties. Givingone person central authority and responsibility for a project or taskis not an effective way to get work done.

　　To what extent do youagree or disagree with the opinion expressed above? Support your viewswith reasons and/or specific examples drawn from your own work orschool experiences, your observations, or your reading.

　　所有的'團(tuán)體和組織都應(yīng)該作為一個(gè)每個(gè)人都參與決定，分享責(zé)任和義務(wù)的團(tuán)隊(duì)來運(yùn)作。給予一個(gè)人關(guān)于一個(gè)項(xiàng)目和行動的集中的權(quán)威和責(zé)任不是完成工作的有效方式。

　　Whichis a more productive method of performing a group task: allowing allgroup members to share in the decision making, duties andresponsibilities, or appointing one member to make decisions, delegateduties and take responsibility? The speakers opinion is that the firstmethod is always the best one. In my view, however, each of thesealternatives is viable in certain circumstances, as illustrated by twovery different examples.

　　A jury in a criminal trial is goodexample of a group in which shared decision-making, duties, andresponsibility is the most appropriate and effective way to get the jobdone. Each member of the jury is on equal footing with the others.While one person is appointed to head the jury, his or her function isto act as facilitator, not as leader. To place ultimate authority andresponsibility on the facilitator would essentially be to appoint ajudge, and to thereby defeat the very purpose of the jury system.

【GMAT新黃金范文參考】相關(guān)文章：

GMAT新黃金范文01-15

新GMAT作文黃金80題范文01-15

十二句GMAT寫作黃金句的參考01-16

GMAT作文黃金題01-15

GMAT寫作黃金句型01-10

GMAT寫作范文參考01-21

GMAT寫作黃金80題01-14

GMAT寫作黃金句型摘錄01-09

GMAT作文范文精選參考08-03