- 相關(guān)推薦
腦中風(fēng)患者接受住院復(fù)健治療預(yù)后功能的研究
【關(guān) 鍵 詞】
腦中風(fēng)Stroke
預(yù)后Prognosis
功能結(jié)果Functional outcomes
復(fù)健治療Rehabilitation therapy
【論文類別】 博士論文
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
【中文摘要】
本前瞻性研究目的主要調(diào)查與探討民國(guó)八十六年一月至十二月期間163位住院高雄醫(yī)學(xué)大學(xué)
附設(shè)中和醫(yī)院復(fù)健科接受復(fù)健治療的腦中風(fēng)患者，其社會(huì)人口學(xué)及住院期間診斷評(píng)估臨床
數(shù)據(jù)、其復(fù)健治療效益性、出院時(shí)日常生活功能預(yù)后進(jìn)步情形和相關(guān)預(yù)測(cè)因子、影響住院
天數(shù)長(zhǎng)短的預(yù)測(cè)因子、出院至少六個(gè)月預(yù)后功能獨(dú)立自主和使用長(zhǎng)期照護(hù)機(jī)構(gòu)的影響因素
和生活型態(tài)改變的情形。
我們的研究結(jié)果顯示：日常生活能力以功能獨(dú)立自主量表(Functional Independence
Measure, FIM)分?jǐn)?shù)為指標(biāo)，在住院期間無(wú)論全部項(xiàng)目得分或其六大類別得分的進(jìn)步量在統(tǒng)
計(jì)學(xué)上都有顯著的意義。這個(gè)結(jié)果可以說(shuō)明復(fù)健治療對(duì)于中風(fēng)病人的預(yù)后結(jié)果扮演重要的
正面角色。影響出院時(shí)FIM量表得分的重要預(yù)測(cè)因子包括年齡、多次中風(fēng)病史、住院期間多
項(xiàng)并發(fā)癥、定向能力異常及神經(jīng)心理功能異常暨失智癥等；而感覺(jué)異常和多次中風(fēng)病史患
者是影響住院期間功能獨(dú)立自主量表進(jìn)步量的重要預(yù)測(cè)因子。
住院時(shí)FIM量表平均得分57.7 ± 24.5；出院前77.3 ± 26.3。住院期間復(fù)健效率平均得分
0.7 ± 0.7和復(fù)健效果30.6 ± 24.0%。對(duì)于復(fù)健治療效率而言，在統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)上有意義的預(yù)測(cè)
因子包括復(fù)健治療住院天數(shù)和患側(cè)上肢近端肢體運(yùn)動(dòng)功能恢復(fù)級(jí)數(shù)，兩項(xiàng)因素可以解釋復(fù)
健治療效率21%的變異量；對(duì)于復(fù)健治療效果而言，在統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)上有意義的預(yù)測(cè)因子包括年齡
和患側(cè)上肢近端肢體運(yùn)動(dòng)功能恢復(fù)級(jí)數(shù)，兩項(xiàng)因素可以解釋復(fù)健治療效果24%的變異量。
住院初期以福格-米勒平衡量表(Fugl-Meyer Balance Scale, FMBS)評(píng)估平衡能力可以解釋
接受復(fù)健治療住院天數(shù)6%的變異量及復(fù)健治療效率3%的變異量；然而，平衡能力無(wú)法提供
解釋住院期間FIM得分進(jìn)步情形的變異量。這些結(jié)果說(shuō)明住院復(fù)健初期臨床使用FMBS量表來(lái)
評(píng)估平衡能力似乎無(wú)法有效預(yù)測(cè)中風(fēng)病患接受復(fù)健治療預(yù)后功能結(jié)果。
住院時(shí)FIM量表得分能力、是否肩關(guān)節(jié)有半脫位、是否兩側(cè)肢體運(yùn)動(dòng)功能皆受損和接受教育
年數(shù)是為住院天數(shù)長(zhǎng)短的的重要預(yù)測(cè)因子。這些重要預(yù)測(cè)因子可以解釋住院天數(shù)長(zhǎng)短21.5%
的變異量。這些結(jié)果可以做為未來(lái)腦中風(fēng)患者接受住院復(fù)健治療健保給付規(guī)劃論病例計(jì)酬
標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的參考。
出院半年后共完成142位個(gè)案日常生活狀態(tài)的追蹤訪視，結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)訪視時(shí)日常生活功能完全
獨(dú)立者共有23位(16.2%)。住院時(shí)加拿大神經(jīng)量表(Canadian Neurological Scale, CNS)得
分能力和住院時(shí)FIM量表得分能力可為中風(fēng)病患復(fù)健治療出院半年后生活功能是否獨(dú)立自主
的重要預(yù)測(cè)因子。
有關(guān)使用長(zhǎng)期照護(hù)機(jī)構(gòu)方面，這部份共完成151位個(gè)案的追蹤訪視。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)訪視時(shí)正住在
長(zhǎng)期照護(hù)機(jī)構(gòu)者共有23位(15.2%)。邏輯回歸分析結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)，兩側(cè)肢體運(yùn)動(dòng)功能是否皆受損
、出院時(shí)意識(shí)狀況是否正常和平衡量表得分能力是為最佳預(yù)測(cè)變項(xiàng)。
有關(guān)預(yù)后生活型態(tài)改變的追蹤研究，這部份以出院至少半年后芙蘭切活動(dòng)量表(Frenchay
Activities Index, FAI)及FIM量表評(píng)估結(jié)果做為預(yù)后全面性日常生活活動(dòng)分析數(shù)據(jù)。結(jié)果
顯示比較發(fā)病前和出院至少半年后訪視時(shí)FAI量表及其三大項(xiàng)目(做家務(wù)事、戶外活動(dòng)及休
閑工作)得分的退步量在統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)上都有顯著的差異性。發(fā)病前和訪視時(shí)FAI量表得分皆與年
齡呈負(fù)相關(guān)性(Pearson r = - 0.24, p< 0.05; r = -0.34, p< 0.001)；訪視時(shí)FAI量表得
分和FIM量表得分呈顯著正相關(guān)性(Pearson r = 0.58, p< 0.001)。這些結(jié)果說(shuō)明使用FAI
量表可以量化腦中風(fēng)患者預(yù)后生活型態(tài)變化的情形。
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
【英文摘要】
The purposes of this prospective study were to investigate the clinical
profile, rehabilitation effectiveness and the functional outcomes at
discharge, to investigate predictive variables of length of rehabilitative
stay, to identify the prognostic factors about functional independence and
long-term care institution utilization, and to investigate the lifestyle
change and analysis of the related factors, at least 6 months after
discharge
for stroke patients following rehabilitation therapy. A total of 163
stroke
patients who were consecutively admitted to the inpatient rehabilitation
department at Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital in 1997 were included
in
this study.
The results indicated that Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score at
discharge and gains were used as the index of prognosis. Statistical
analyses
indicated that significant improvement in each FIM subscale scores was
noted.
Significant predictors of discharge FIM scores include age, previous
attacks
twice or over, medical comorbidities, sensory and orientation impairments,
and
dementia. In addition, previous stroke attacks twice or over and sensory
impairment were significant predictors of FIM gains during rehabilitation
period.
The mean FIM score was 57.7 ± 24.5 at admission versus 77.3 ± 26.3 at
discharge. The mean rehabilitation efficiency (0.7 ± 0.7) and
effectiveness (
30.6 ± 24.0%) of stroke rehabilitation were determined. Rehabilitation
efficiency and rehabilitation effectiveness were significantly predicted
by
length of rehabilitation stay and arm motor recovery stage, and by age and
arm
motor recovery stage, respectively. The variance explained only 21% of the
rehabilitation efficiency and 24% of the achievement of rehabilitation
potential.
The Fugl-Meyer Balance Scale (FMBS) score at admission accounted for 6% of
the
variation in length of stay, once demographic influences were controlled.
The
FIM efficiency score could possibly be predicted by the balance ability at
admission, which accounted for 3% of the variance. However, the balance
score
could not provide predictive information about the FIM gain with
demographic
factors controlled. These findings suggest that the use of FMBS at
admission
to stroke inpatient rehabilitation seemed not to enhance the ability to
predict rehabilitation outcomes.
Admission FIM score, shoulder subluxation, bilateral limbs involvement and
the
level of education significantly predicted length of stay (LOS). But, the
variance of the LOS was explained only 21.5%. The results of this study
suggest that these objective predictors can be used as the basis of
reimbursement for stroke rehabilitation in case payment system in the
future.
Of the 142 subjects surveyed at least 6-month follow-up visit after
discharge,
23 (16.2%) stroke patients had been functional independence outcome at
home.
The results of this study suggest the usefulness of the admission Canadian
Neurological Scale (CNS) and FIM scores in the prediction of functional
independence outcome for stroke survivors following rehabilitation
therapy.
Of the 151 subjects surveyed at least 6-month follow-up visit after
discharge,
23 (15.2%) patients had been living in long-term care institutions.
Whether
they had (1) limbs bilaterally affected, (2) impaired orientation, or (3)
poor
standing ability at discharge were the strongest predictors of long-term
care
institution utilization for stroke patients following rehabilitation
therapy.
FIM instrument and Frenchay Activities Index (FAI) as comprehensive
assessment
of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) were measured at least 6 months
following
the onset of stroke. Significant differences were observed in the FAI
subscore (domestic chores, outdoor activities, and leisure/work
activities)
between prestroke and poststroke status at interview. FAI scores at
prestroke
and poststroke status were negatively correlated (r =- 0.24, p < 0.05;
r=-0.
35, p<0.001) with age; FAI score was positively correlated (r = 0.58, p <
0.
001) with FIM score. The findings indicated that FAI score is useful as a
quantitative index of the lifestyle change on the prognosis for stroke
patients.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
【 目 錄 】
目 錄
博士論文總摘要 1~3
Abstract of Dissertation 4~7
第一章 緒論：前言、文獻(xiàn)探討及本研究目的和規(guī)畫(huà) 1-1~14
第二章 腦中風(fēng)患者的臨床數(shù)據(jù)和功能恢復(fù)情況的研究 2-1~16
第三章 腦中風(fēng)患者復(fù)健治療預(yù)后的初步研究3-1~24
第四章 初次中風(fēng)病人復(fù)健治療的效率和效果4-1~18
第五章 腦中風(fēng)患者住院時(shí)平衡能力和預(yù)后功能的關(guān)系 5-1~13
第六章 影響腦中風(fēng)患者復(fù)健治療住院天數(shù)長(zhǎng)短的因素 6-1~16
第七章 影響腦中風(fēng)患者預(yù)后功能獨(dú)立的因素 7-1~16
第八章 影響腦中風(fēng)患者預(yù)后使用長(zhǎng)期照護(hù)機(jī)構(gòu)的因素 8-1~16
第九章 腦中風(fēng)患者預(yù)后生活型態(tài)改變的追蹤研究 9-1~17
第十章 結(jié)論：研究成果與未來(lái)展望 10-1~13
附錄一：功能獨(dú)立自主量表(Functional Independence Measure, FIM)
附錄二：福格-米勒平衡量表(Fugl-Meyer Balance Scale, FMBS)
附錄三：加拿大神經(jīng)量表(Canadian Neurological Scale, CNS)
附錄四：芙蘭切活動(dòng)量表(Frenchay Activities Index, FAI)
附錄五：本研究相關(guān)論文發(fā)表成果
表目錄
INDEX OF TABLE
表2-1. 163位中風(fēng)病患的基本人口學(xué)數(shù)據(jù)
Demographic data of 163 stroke patients
表2-2. 住院期間臨床診斷檢查和評(píng)估數(shù)據(jù)
Clinical and diagnostic factors of 163 stroke patients
表2-3. 住院期間功能獨(dú)立量表主要項(xiàng)目得分和進(jìn)步量
Functional improvement on subscale and total FIM score during inpatient
rehabilitation
表2-4. 接受復(fù)健治療前后步行及生活能力獨(dú)立狀況的人數(shù)比較
Comparison of number of persons with ambulation and ADL independence
following rehabilitation therapy
表3-1. 147位中風(fēng)病患的基本人口學(xué)數(shù)據(jù)
Demographic data of 147 stroke patients
表3-2. 住院期間臨床診斷檢查和評(píng)估數(shù)據(jù)
Clinical and diagnostic factors of 147 stroke patients
表3-3. 住院期間功能獨(dú)立量表主要項(xiàng)目得分和進(jìn)步量
Functional improvement on subscale and total FIM score during inpatient
rehabilitation
表3-4. 皮爾森相關(guān)系數(shù)分析序位/等距變項(xiàng)和預(yù)后功能的間的相關(guān)性
Pearson correlation for ordinal/interval variables considered in
predicting functional outcome
表3-5. Student's t-test 檢定類別變項(xiàng)和預(yù)后功能結(jié)果的間的差異性
Student's t-test for nominal variables on functional outcome of stroke
patients
表3-6. 類別變項(xiàng)和預(yù)后功能的間的變異數(shù)分析
Analysis of variance for nominal variables on functional outcome
表3-7. 復(fù)回歸分析預(yù)測(cè)中風(fēng)病人出院FIM量表得分的結(jié)果
Multiple regression analysis predicting discharge FIM score
表3-8. 復(fù)回歸分析預(yù)測(cè)中風(fēng)病人FIM量表進(jìn)步量的結(jié)果
Multiple regression analysis predicting FIM improvement
表4-1. 110位初次中風(fēng)病患的基本人口學(xué)和臨床診斷檢查數(shù)據(jù)
Clinical and demographic data of first 110 stroke patients
表4-2. 住院期間功能獨(dú)立量表主要項(xiàng)目得分和進(jìn)步量
Functional improvement on subscale and total FIM score during inpatient
rehabilitation
表4-3. 皮爾森相關(guān)系數(shù)分析序位/等距變項(xiàng)和預(yù)后功能的間的相關(guān)性
Pearson correlation analysis between ordinal/interval
variables and rehabilitation outcome
表4-4. Student's t-test 檢定類別變項(xiàng)和預(yù)后功能結(jié)果的間的差異性
Difference between nominal variables and rehabilitation outcome as
assessed by Student's t-test
表4-5. 復(fù)回歸分析預(yù)測(cè)110位初次中風(fēng)病人復(fù)健治療的效率和效果
Multiple regression analyses predicting rehabilitation outcome in 110
patients with first stroke
表5-1. 163位中風(fēng)病患的基本數(shù)據(jù)
Basic data of 163 stroke patients
表5-2. 皮爾森相關(guān)系數(shù)分析平衡能力和住院時(shí)FIM量表得分及預(yù)后 功能間的相
關(guān)性
Pearson's correlation analyses between balance score and FIM score and
rehabilitation outcome
表5-3. 復(fù)回歸分析剛住院時(shí)平衡能力得分和預(yù)后功能結(jié)果的關(guān)系
Multiple regression analyses between admission balance score
and rehabilitation outcomes
表6-1. 中風(fēng)病患的基本數(shù)據(jù) (n=163)
Basic data of 163 stroke patients
表6-2. Pearson 相關(guān)系數(shù)檢定住院天數(shù)長(zhǎng)短和等距變項(xiàng)的相關(guān)性
Pearson correlation analysis between ordinal/interval variables and
length of rehabilitation stay
表6-3. Student's t-test 檢定住院天數(shù)長(zhǎng)短和類別變項(xiàng)的差異性
Difference between nominal variables and length of rehabilitation stay
as
assessed by Student's t-test
表6-4. 相關(guān)影響因素對(duì)住院天數(shù)長(zhǎng)短的復(fù)回歸分析
Multiple regression analyses predicting length of rehabilitation stay
表7-1. 中風(fēng)病人預(yù)后功能獨(dú)立與否兩組間相關(guān)變項(xiàng)的差異性比較
Comparison of prospective factors between patients with functional
independence or dependence
表7-2. 預(yù)后功能獨(dú)立與否的影響因素及關(guān)聯(lián)程度的檢定
Associations between prospective factors and functional independence
表7-3. 影響中風(fēng)病患預(yù)后功能獨(dú)立與否的最佳預(yù)測(cè)因子
Selected predictors influencing functional independence outcome
表8-1. 151位中風(fēng)病患的基本數(shù)據(jù)
Basic data of 151 stroke patients
表8-2. 出院后使用長(zhǎng)期照護(hù)機(jī)構(gòu)的影響因素及關(guān)聯(lián)程度的檢定
Associations between prospective factors and utilization of long-term
care institution
表8-3. 影響中風(fēng)病患出院后使用長(zhǎng)期照護(hù)機(jī)構(gòu)的最佳預(yù)測(cè)因子
Selected predictors influencing utilization of long-term care
institution
表9-1. 104位首次中風(fēng)病患的基本數(shù)據(jù)
Basic data of 104 first stroke patients
表9-2. 中風(fēng)患者芙蘭切活動(dòng)量表分?jǐn)?shù)變化情形
FAI change on subscale and total score between prestroke and
post-stroke
表9-3. 類別變項(xiàng)對(duì)于中風(fēng)患者出院至少半年后FAI量表得分退步的 影響
Difference between nominal variables and FAI change as assessed by
Student's t-test
表9-4. 中風(fēng)病發(fā)前和出院至少半年后訪視時(shí)FAI量表得分及退步量
與年齡、教育年限及訪視時(shí)FIM量表分?jǐn)?shù)的相關(guān)性
Pearson's correlation between prestroke FAI score, post-stroke FAI
score
at visit, and FAI change and age, the years of
education, and FIM score at visit
圖目錄
INDEX OF FIGURE
圖 1-1. 研究體系結(jié)構(gòu)：中風(fēng)病人復(fù)健治療預(yù)后預(yù)測(cè)因子和功能結(jié)果
Research framework：predictors and functional outcomes for
post-stroke patients following rehabilitation therapy
圖9-1. 中風(fēng)患者發(fā)病前芙蘭切量表得分分布
Histogram with normal curve superimposed over the
distribution of Frenchay Activities Index total score at pre-stroke
圖9-2. 中風(fēng)患者預(yù)后訪視時(shí)芙蘭切量表得分分布
Histogram with normal curve superimposed over the
distribution of Frenchay Activities Index total score at post-stroke
論文關(guān)鍵字：
【腦中風(fēng)患者接受住院復(fù)健治療預(yù)后功能的研究】相關(guān)文章：
恩替卡韋治療拉米夫定失效慢性乙肝患者研究06-02
多層螺旋CT心功能評(píng)價(jià)研究概況06-14
從不同治療原則論失眠的針刺研究05-30
流動(dòng)兒童接受城市教育過(guò)程中存在的問(wèn)題研究的論文10-01
談帕金森病患者伴精神病性癥狀的藥物治療08-22
行為護(hù)理對(duì)腦梗塞運(yùn)動(dòng)功能障礙患者康復(fù)效果影響以及臨床效果觀察08-14
制度的功能06-06
PDF網(wǎng)元防“濫用”功能的分析和同類網(wǎng)元可重用性的研究05-11
從接受美學(xué)視角探討廣告翻譯05-22