企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則第22號(hào)-金融工具確認(rèn)與計(jì)量的相關(guān)問(wèn)題研究

畢業(yè)論文

企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則第22號(hào)——金融工具確認(rèn)與計(jì)量的相關(guān)問(wèn)題研究
 
摘要：20世紀(jì)80年代以來(lái)，國(guó)際上各種降低市場(chǎng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的金融創(chuàng)新層出不窮，我國(guó)金融工具無(wú)論是品種還是交易量都得到了迅速增長(zhǎng)。交易方式日趨靈活，與之相關(guān)的法律規(guī)范已經(jīng)基本建立，也形成了比較成熟的市場(chǎng)。金融工具既是規(guī)避風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的手段，其本身又是1個(gè)巨大的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)源。由于金融工具的特殊性，不能進(jìn)入傳統(tǒng)的財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)告體系，這將誤導(dǎo)投資者，極大損害投資者的利益，金融工具會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則的出臺(tái)順理成章。本文采用規(guī)范研究方法，充分借鑒國(guó)際和國(guó)內(nèi)已有的理論與實(shí)務(wù)成果，通過(guò)與國(guó)外和國(guó)內(nèi)現(xiàn)行規(guī)定相比較，闡述新準(zhǔn)則制定的理論基礎(chǔ)、現(xiàn)實(shí)背景，并針對(duì)性的提出個(gè)人的改進(jìn)意見(jiàn)。本文認(rèn)為新準(zhǔn)則和原制度存在較大差異，而趨近于國(guó)際會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則。在確定無(wú)公開(kāi)標(biāo)價(jià)金融工具的公允價(jià)值，處理公允價(jià)值變動(dòng)和使用全面公允價(jià)值計(jì)量方面仍需改進(jìn)。

關(guān)鍵詞: 金融工具 確認(rèn) 計(jì)量

The Crrelated Study on Accounting Standards for Business Enterprises No22.——Recognition and Measurement of Financial Instruments
 
Abstract: The international market to reduce the risk of various financial innovation endlessly, our country financial instruments both varieties or trading volume has been growing rapidly since the 1980s. Trading has become increasingly flexible, with the relevant legal norms has been basically established, which has formed a relatively mature market. Financial instruments are not only a means to avoid risks, which in itself is a great source of the risk. Due to the special nature of financial instruments, it not have access to traditional financial reporting system, which will mislead investors and greatly damage the interests of investors, so the financial instruments’ accounting norm appears publicly and logically. In this paper, using standardized methodology, draw on the existing domestic and international theoretical and practical results, through introducing the content of new guidelines, and compared to its foreign and domestic’s existing provisions, then expound the theoretical foundation and background of the new guidelines, at last put forward the improvements targeted personal opinions. This paper points out that the new guidelines and the current system has a big difference, and close to international accounting standards. In determining an open tender without financial instruments at fair value, handling changes in the fair value and using of comprehensive and fair value measurement are still needed to be improved.

Keywords: financial instruments  recognition  measurement

【企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則第22號(hào)-金融工具確認(rèn)與計(jì)量的相關(guān)問(wèn)題研究】相關(guān)文章：

員工股票期權(quán)的確認(rèn)與計(jì)量問(wèn)題研究03-21

企業(yè)合并商譽(yù)的確認(rèn)與計(jì)量問(wèn)題探討03-18

企業(yè)合并中商譽(yù)的初始確認(rèn)問(wèn)題研究03-02

淺談衍生金融工具的會(huì)計(jì)確認(rèn)與計(jì)量03-25

企業(yè)全面收益的確認(rèn)、計(jì)量及報(bào)告03-21

計(jì)量法學(xué)本體問(wèn)題研究03-25

衍生金融工具計(jì)量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的選擇12-09

對(duì)新企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則中會(huì)計(jì)計(jì)量問(wèn)題的幾點(diǎn)思考03-26

淺析《企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則-固定資產(chǎn)》及相關(guān)問(wèn)題12-06