論刑事訴訟之言詞原則

摘    要

言詞原則成為現(xiàn)代法制社會刑事訴訟中通行的原則,主要是因其在保障法庭審理的對抗性的同時(shí),既能體現(xiàn)訴訟程序的合理性又能保障案件事實(shí)真相之發(fā)現(xiàn)。我國修改后的刑訴法確立了具有明顯對抗色彩的“抗辯式”庭審方式,但立法上卻沒有確保這1庭審方式有效運(yùn)作的言詞原則,甚至立法和有關(guān)司法解釋中有些內(nèi)容還嚴(yán)重背離了言詞原則的要求,不能滿足司法實(shí)踐中保障被告人質(zhì)證權(quán)和發(fā)現(xiàn)案件事實(shí)真相的雙重需要。因此,確立言詞原則并對有關(guān)刑事訴訟法條文進(jìn)行修改和補(bǔ)充,將對我國刑事訴訟的民主進(jìn)程發(fā)揮積極的推動(dòng)作用。
關(guān)鍵詞：言詞原則；保障；完善

ABSTRACT

The principle of verbalism that becomes worldwide practices principles of contemporary legal society is main based on that it can guarantee participants contesting on court trial, mean while, it also embody the procedure reasonableness as well as guarantee the case’s facts to be disclosed. The reviewed criminal procedure law of our country build an accusing-defending trial model that aiming at end chancing the participants contesting on court. But the law did not build the principle of verbalism that could guarantee the accusing-defending trial model to be operation efficiently, besides, some articles of legislation and judicial interpretation are deviate from the principle of verbalism .that is to say, the legisilation is no longer fully catch up with the double needness to guarantee the case’s facts. Therefore, to establish the principle verbalism and to mend or comlete the articles of our criminal procedure law can surely propel the democratic course of our criminal procedure actively.

Key words: the principle of verbalism; suggestion; perfection
..............................
注：【包括：畢業(yè)論文，任務(wù)書，開題報(bào)告】

【論刑事訴訟之言詞原則】相關(guān)文章：

論刑事訴訟中控審分離原則的理論與實(shí)踐03-25

論刑事訴訟的“中立”理念03-19

論ＷＴＯ原則與稅法原則的契合03-20

論民事調(diào)解原則03-24

論權(quán)利失效原則03-28

論刑事訴訟中的免證事實(shí)03-28

論刑事訴訟“物”的內(nèi)涵、特性及功能03-23

論財(cái)政公平原則03-20

論稅法原則及其功能03-18