刑事訴訟當(dāng)事人問(wèn)題研究

摘 要

現(xiàn)行《刑事訴訟法》對(duì)當(dāng)事人進(jìn)行了規(guī)范，但是，在刑事立法和司法實(shí)踐領(lǐng)域中，均存在許多需要進(jìn)1步完善的問(wèn)題。基于刑事訴訟當(dāng)事人的基本概念和范圍，有必要對(duì)檢察官當(dāng)事人化問(wèn)題提出質(zhì)疑，通過(guò)分析檢察官在法庭審判中所處的訴訟地位、所行使的訴訟權(quán)利及其所負(fù)有的客觀義務(wù)，借鑒國(guó)外及國(guó)際上對(duì)此問(wèn)題的規(guī)定，完善和促進(jìn)我國(guó)刑事訴訟當(dāng)事人制度的發(fā)展。

關(guān)鍵詞：刑事訴訟當(dāng)事人；檢察官當(dāng)事人化；客觀公正義務(wù)；控辯平衡

Abstract

The present "Law of Criminal Procedure" has regulated many provisions of the litigant lawsuit right, but in the criminal judicature legislation and practice domain, there still existed many flaws, which needed the further consummation. The paper, embarking from basic concept and scope of the criminal prosecution litigant, proposes   necessary suspections on criminal prosecution litigant. From the public prosecutor’s lawsuit status and his objective obligation, combined with the stipulation to this question home and abroad. This paper does some analysis and researches in order to consummate and finally promotes the development of our countrys criminal prosecution litigant system.

Key words: Litigant;Objective obligation;the equality of debates
..............................
注：【包括：畢業(yè)論文，任務(wù)書(shū)，開(kāi)題報(bào)告】

【刑事訴訟當(dāng)事人問(wèn)題研究】相關(guān)文章：

簡(jiǎn)析當(dāng)事人和解公訴案件實(shí)行檢調(diào)對(duì)接機(jī)制若干問(wèn)題研究12-27

刑事訴訟法學(xué)研究范式的反思（二）03-22

刑事訴訟法學(xué)研究范式的反思（一）03-25

公務(wù)法人問(wèn)題研究12-06

防衛(wèi)限度問(wèn)題研究12-12

刑事訴訟中強(qiáng)制措施存在的問(wèn)題及其完善02-27

數(shù)學(xué)問(wèn)題研究論文12-02

關(guān)于病案管理問(wèn)題研究03-20

關(guān)于企業(yè)驗(yàn)資問(wèn)題的研究03-11