辯論賽流程英文版

時間：2022-10-13 00:41:22 辯論賽我要投稿

相關(guān)推薦

辯論賽流程英文版

　　A, shall be borne by the chairman of the debate

辯論賽流程英文版

　　1, the debate began

　　2, announced the motion

　　3, introduce the participating team and its position

　　4, introduce team member

　　5, introduce rules, judges and staff

　　6, debate competition

　　7, the judges review

　　8, for audience questions, the judges score (simultaneous)

　　9, announced the result of the match

　　The debate over 10

　　Second, the process of the debate

　　1, the theoretical stage defense:

　　(1) positive and argue against a speech made by positive and negative sides ZhuBian stated his own first main point. Must be completed within the specified time.

　　(2) positive and opposite two apology speech square 2, against two contend with concise text focuses theoretically demonstrated their own point of view,

　　(3) positive and opposite three speech by square three, against three respectively with concise text carries on the empirical analysis, provide arguments to support his own views.

　　Phase 2, free debate by tetragonal speak first, then the opposition spokesman, sides took turns to speak. (in a relatively concentrated period of time)

　　3, summarize four contend for final statement by both parties, summarizes has side view, refute each other subjective point:

　　(1) argue against four summation

　　(2) square four summation

　　4. Audience member: the audience to questions of both players, players must give the answer patiently. Stage performance is not recorded in the results of the competition between the two sides to ask a question.

　　5, the judges scoring stage

　　6, the judges review the process of both views and debate.

　　7, the announcement

　　Three, the rules of the debate

　　1, each member must be finished within the prescribed period of time, over time, in accordance with abstained processing, and lose from team total score 5 points.

　　2, free debate rules free debate speech must alternates between the teams, the first to speak with a member of tetragonal, then one by opposition players, the two sides take turns, until you run out of time. (each a free debate in the concentration of two hours to complete, what time each other, each stick words between 60-800 words, can only ask a question at a time.)

　　Fourth, criteria

　　(a) will be hired to review all the five judges of the game.

　　(2) criteria

　　1, point clear, argument is sufficient, citing appropriate, analyzed thoroughly.

　　2, grabbed the other views and error, precedents and precise, and to the point.

　　3, reflect agile, strong ability to deal with.

　　4, articulate, level clear, tight logic.

　　(3) the scoring method (group and individual scores respectively, out of 100)

　　(1) the topic: can the logic, theory, from the position held by the fact that such as multi-level and multi-angle, argument is sufficient, reasoning is clear, whether for his own difficulties with effective treatment methods.

　　(2) the argument: if there is a convincing argument, argument is sufficient, whether logical reasoning process, the fact whether the reference is proper, true.

　　(3) dispute: to ask whether to grab the key, the problem simple. No questions or questions within the time required, should be appropriate. The question of whether or not to answer each other, can you give a person the sense with justified. Don't answer or not answer should be penalised accordingly.

　　(4) : whether to have team spirit, mutual support, debate cohesion is closely. Whether q&a form an organic whole, to a powerful blow to the other party.

　　(5) argue the wind: the language and debate style exquisite civility. Personal attacks will be made to argue each other friends and netizens.

　　(4) points: every topic, argument, dispute, cooperate, argue the wind project, do not conform to the requirements of the evaluation and in violation of the rules, are appropriate. Due to the fault causes of incidents affect the game, is decided by the jury, in a 5-10% reduction of its cumulative total score.

　　(5) score project group and individual points per game comparison table is as follows:

　　(6) score project group and individual points per game of appraisal form

　　(7) good debater respectively by the outcome of each race scores are the highest return. The game of "best debater" tired integral calculation by the individual scores the highest gain, formula is: the total integral/attend the session.

　　(8) the outcome of judgment

　　1, the outcome of the game, on the basis of a few judges play group points, remove the a and a minimum points, calculating the remaining points scored an average of judgement.

　　2, debater individual scoring points calculation method, calculation method with groups only as an individual award review basis, has nothing to do with judging each outcome.

　　Five, awards and incentives

　　1, every game are selected each a good debater each team, will decide after the game one of the best debater.

　　一、由辯論會主席承擔

　　1、辯論賽開始

　　2、宣布辯題

　　3、介紹參賽代表隊及所持立場

　　4、介紹參賽隊員

　　5、介紹規(guī)則、評委及工作人員

　　6、辯論比賽

　　7、評委點評

　　8、觀眾自由提問，評委評分(同時進行)

　　9、宣布比賽結(jié)果